![]() |
Malus’ law using SensorTag - Printable Version +- phyphox Forums (https://phyphox.org/forums) +-- Forum: Discussion (https://phyphox.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Experiments and Ideas (https://phyphox.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=4) +--- Thread: Malus’ law using SensorTag (/showthread.php?tid=1221) Pages:
1
2
|
RE: Malus’ law using SensorTag - Jens Noriʇzsɔɥ - 03-31-2022 It is more of an offset rather than a cut-off, isn't it? I have briefly discussed with Sebastian about it: it might also be some non linearity that “shifts” the fit or some relic of the algorithm for the sensor output data. Anyway, I am pretty impressed from the result. I would like to share this on Twitter tomorrow morning, same on Facebook a bit latter so that it does not lose attenuation due to some other … announcement. ![]() RE: Malus’ law using SensorTag - solid - 04-04-2022 Hello Jens. What I see on the measurement done by smartphone it is a negative shift with a clear cutoff of the signal at zero level... I do not see a notable non-linearity... There is no distortion on the measurements done by Sensor Tag. ![]() Greetings Mikhail RE: Malus’ law using SensorTag - Jens Noriʇzsɔɥ - 04-04-2022 It cannot go below zero, can it? Perhaps the word “cutoff” gets lost in translation: I would not put it that way in German… ![]() Thanks for checking. RE: Malus’ law using SensorTag - solid - 04-22-2023 Hi, after passing to phyphox version 1.1.12-beta2 my polarization experiment does not work anymore with the SensorTag ![]() ![]() With Brest wishes ![]() Mikhail RE: Malus’ law using SensorTag - Jens Noriʇzsɔɥ - 04-22-2023 First, thanks for reporting that there is also a problem with the SensorTag. We are aware of BLE problems with the beta version on Android and Dominik is already onto it, AFAIK. RE: Malus’ law using SensorTag - Jens Noriʇzsɔɥ - 05-02-2023 The new beta (3) is out. Could you please check if it fixes your issues with the SensorTag? |