+- phyphox Forums (https://phyphox.org/forums)
+-- Forum: Discussion (https://phyphox.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: General (https://phyphox.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Thread: CC2541 (SensorTag 1st gen) support/issue (/showthread.php?tid=930)
CC2541 (SensorTag 1st gen) support/issue - SJS - 07-10-2020
Hi everyone,
more or less by chance, I connected my 1st gen SensorTag CC2541 to phyphox and successfully performed a measurement (amb & ir temp). IR is messed up because of the missing calibration (CC2541 uses a tmp006, CC2560 a tmp007), but ambient works fine.
My old CC2541 was already advertising as I tried a new experiment so I accidentally chose it instead of the CC2650. Why was I so surprised? Because in any other test runs phyphox returned the attached errors (English one is android on a nexus 4 and German one is iOS 13 on an iPhone). I first thought this is because they completely differ regarding the gatt table, but both use the same base uuid F0000000-0451-4000-B000-000000000000 and for temperature:
Code:
Type UUID Access Size (bytes)
Data AA01* R/N 4
Notification R/W 2
Configuration AA02* R/W 1
Period AA03* R/W 1So why did it work this time? The thing is, that I forgot to set the period in the bluetooth configuration. In any other cases I tried setting it and phyphox returned the errors. Immediately, I opened the standard IR temperature experiment from the phyphox editor and I was able to reproduce the issue: as long as phyphox tries to set a different period, the error is returned. As soon as I delete it from the configuration, it works. Am I missing something?
@phyphox team: is this a known issue? If you have the resources to also look into it and since we are practically neighbors (I'm from cologne) I'd be happy to bring/send one 1st gen SensorTag over to Aachen for further development!
In the meantime I'll try to adapt the standard IR temperature experiment to the tmp006 sensor and take a closer look at the other sensors in the CC2541's gatt table and compare them to the CC2650. Any help is much appreciated! Sebastian
PS: I used the CC2650 users guide and this one from the internet archive for the CC2541.
RE: CC2541 (SensorTag 1st gen) support/issue - Sebastian Staacks - 07-21-2020
Sorry, I missed your post and a colleague just drew my attention to it.
You are right. It seems like it should just work on the older SensorTag and I have no idea why it should fail. A first thought is that maybe the older SensorTag does not allow setting a rate before the sensor has been enabled, so maybe just switching the first two config entries might already help. But then again, the errors on Android and iOS suggest that the characteristic is not even available (even though both errors have a different wording, they are both triggered if the UUID is not in the list of characteristics), which I find very strange.
So, I see two options:
a) You can try the app nRF Connect to see the characteristic is available and if you can set it manually.
b) You can indeed send the SensorTag to me, so I can find the problem (I would suggest to contact me via staacks@physik.rwth-aachen.de in this case).
RE: CC2541 (SensorTag 1st gen) support/issue - SJS - 07-21-2020
Hi Sebastian, thanks for the reply and no worries!
>>A first thought is that maybe the older SensorTag does not allow setting a rate before the sensor has been enabled, so maybe just switching the first two config entries might already help.
I have tried this, unfortunately it didn't work.
>> So, I see two options (...)
I think I'll do both
Check your inbox! Sebastian
RE: CC2541 (SensorTag 1st gen) support/issue - SJS - 07-23-2020
quick update:
I did a scan with the nRF app, as Sebastian mentioned, and it seems that the characteristic corresponding to the period does not even appear in the attribute table.
Excitingly, this does not affect all sensors, for the accelerometer, for example, the corresponding data is available in the attribute table.
I have two CC2541 and the board revision is 1.3 each and I've tried the firmwares 1.3 and 1.4.1. Does anyone have another version so we can compare?
Attached: screenshots and log files.