08-30-2022, 04:58 PM
Thanks for this info, very helpful. One issue is that I think I misinterpreted the docs. I had selected "without g" because for some reason I had it in my head that it was the non-fusion sensor. For data like this, I will proceed in the future "with g" so that I don't depend on the other sensors.
Looking forward to the next version. Yes I've noticed this same effect before albeit not in an extreme roller coaster environment. I always assumed it was user-error on my part or maybe too much data acquired for a buffer or something. I will do some controlled experiments and raise the issue again if I think it's warranted.
I'm curious about how the magnetometer enters in. The gyroscope makes sense for a correction, but I'm unclear about how/why the magnetometer enters in, esp in any experiment that is "local enough."
Thanks for the replies!
Looking forward to the next version. Yes I've noticed this same effect before albeit not in an extreme roller coaster environment. I always assumed it was user-error on my part or maybe too much data acquired for a buffer or something. I will do some controlled experiments and raise the issue again if I think it's warranted.
I'm curious about how the magnetometer enters in. The gyroscope makes sense for a correction, but I'm unclear about how/why the magnetometer enters in, esp in any experiment that is "local enough."
Thanks for the replies!