06-29-2024, 07:40 PM
(I won't tell anybody. Thanks.)
(I loaded my experiment into the new editor, changed only its name, nothing else, and loaded it via QR into the same mobil phone. Experiment does not work.)
First difference in the XML created by the new editor is that there are no buffer size "1" attributes.
Old editor:
New editor:
I use other buffer sizes as well, "0", "3", "10", and "1000", they all are available in the new editor's XML, but all buffer size "1" attributes are missing in the XML, but are displayed as "1" in the Web UI of the new editor.
New editor:
People will miss the map and the lines which provide some higher view on more complex algorithms.
The new editor provides a more linear programming experience. I can see the advantages of both editors.
For the moment I stay with the old one.
(Is there already some secret documentation for the new editor?)
(I loaded my experiment into the new editor, changed only its name, nothing else, and loaded it via QR into the same mobil phone. Experiment does not work.)
First difference in the XML created by the new editor is that there are no buffer size "1" attributes.
Old editor:
Quote:<container size="1" static="false">lat_count</container>
New editor:
Quote:<container>lat_count</container>
I use other buffer sizes as well, "0", "3", "10", and "1000", they all are available in the new editor's XML, but all buffer size "1" attributes are missing in the XML, but are displayed as "1" in the Web UI of the new editor.
New editor:
Quote:<container size="3">UTM_Easting</container>
People will miss the map and the lines which provide some higher view on more complex algorithms.
The new editor provides a more linear programming experience. I can see the advantages of both editors.
For the moment I stay with the old one.
(Is there already some secret documentation for the new editor?)