03-17-2025, 01:53 AM
(This post was last modified: 03-19-2025, 10:23 AM by Jens Noriʇzsɔɥ.
Edit Reason: nomenclature, applic, 3rd, not care
)
to moderator, the first image which was the plotted content from the cw source (IERS), I was the source of the modifications seen in subsequent images. as for the phyphox angle - I don't think I could have described it clearer,
1. use accelerometers to plot a path
2.the depictions discovered from my cw project would help interpret data when it is a rotary observation.
[3. see touchscreen thread]
5b. I had come back bc I forgot to add "second depiction" for result of the second "third depiction"(since you could open or unroll a circle; fifth was really "fourth depiction" again on the result of the second third, not shown).
if it helps I will supply the credit image here too.
As for copyright, I don't really care what people do with my stuff, it was supplied chiefly for purpose of helping others replicate the suggestions, and suggestions can lose their validity if they are not given a real life application.
moderate again if you must (to return above to original or to clean this too). At least /you/ have what I thought should be included.
1. use accelerometers to plot a path
2.the depictions discovered from my cw project would help interpret data when it is a rotary observation.
[3. see touchscreen thread]
5b. I had come back bc I forgot to add "second depiction" for result of the second "third depiction"(since you could open or unroll a circle; fifth was really "fourth depiction" again on the result of the second third, not shown).
if it helps I will supply the credit image here too.
As for copyright, I don't really care what people do with my stuff, it was supplied chiefly for purpose of helping others replicate the suggestions, and suggestions can lose their validity if they are not given a real life application.
moderate again if you must (to return above to original or to clean this too). At least /you/ have what I thought should be included.