This forum uses cookies
This forum makes use of cookies to store your login information if you are registered, and your last visit if you are not. Cookies are small text documents stored on your computer; the cookies set by this forum can only be used on this website and pose no security risk. Cookies on this forum also track the specific topics you have read and when you last read them. Please confirm whether you accept or reject these cookies being set.

A cookie will be stored in your browser regardless of choice to prevent you being asked this question again. You will be able to change your cookie settings at any time using the link in the footer.

Illuminance vs. distance with SensorTag
Thank you for your suggestions and comments, Sebastian!

I will definitely try the "slow" data acquisition to allow the phyphox program to present the final figure by itself. It would be nice to add a possibility to phyphox to change the sleep time as a parameter of the program.

Another "problem" which I have not mentioned is that here the mouth motion is not registered when it does not move, while the light intensity is recorded continuously. For the moment the program is just a sum of two independent blocks developed independently. Some changes have to be done for their better integration together. For this I have to understand better the existing program for the mouse.

And I am awaiting for the "proper interpolation function" even while I do not think that phyphox should be overloaded with additional functions. I prefer to use phyphox for collection of data which can be treated somewhere else.

Messages In This Thread
RE: Illuminance vs. distance with SensorTag - by solid - 05-06-2020, 07:08 AM

Forum Jump: