Posts: 463
Threads: 17
Joined: Apr 2020
Institution: RWTH Aachen University
It is more of an offset rather than a cut-off, isn't it? I have briefly discussed with Sebastian about it: it might also be some non linearity that “shifts” the fit or some relic of the algorithm for the sensor output data.
Anyway, I am pretty impressed from the result. I would like to share this on Twitter tomorrow morning, same on Facebook a bit latter so that it does not lose attenuation due to some other … announcement.
Posts: 170
Threads: 17
Joined: Nov 2019
Institution: Université de Bretagne Occidentale
Hello Jens.
What I see on the measurement done by smartphone it is a negative shift with a clear cutoff of the signal at zero level... I do not see a notable non-linearity... There is no distortion on the measurements done by Sensor Tag.
Greetings
Mikhail
Posts: 463
Threads: 17
Joined: Apr 2020
Institution: RWTH Aachen University
It cannot go below zero, can it? Perhaps the word “cutoff” gets lost in translation: I would not put it that way in German…
Thanks for checking.
Posts: 170
Threads: 17
Joined: Nov 2019
Institution: Université de Bretagne Occidentale
04-22-2023, 10:39 AM
Hi,
after passing to phyphox version 1.1.12-beta2 my polarization experiment does not work anymore with the SensorTag
. No indication while running and crash phyphox on a new device. What can be upgraded in order to repair this problem?
We use this program showing to students the real Malus law.
With Brest wishes
Mikhail
Posts: 463
Threads: 17
Joined: Apr 2020
Institution: RWTH Aachen University
04-22-2023, 10:57 AM
(This post was last modified: 04-22-2023, 10:58 AM by Jens Noriʇzsɔɥ.)
First, thanks for reporting that there is also a problem with the SensorTag. We are aware of BLE problems with the beta version on Android and Dominik is already onto it, AFAIK.
Posts: 463
Threads: 17
Joined: Apr 2020
Institution: RWTH Aachen University
The new beta (3) is out. Could you please check if it fixes your issues with the SensorTag?
