This forum uses cookies
This forum makes use of cookies to store your login information if you are registered, and your last visit if you are not. Cookies are small text documents stored on your computer; the cookies set by this forum can only be used on this website and pose no security risk. Cookies on this forum also track the specific topics you have read and when you last read them. Please confirm whether you accept or reject these cookies being set.

A cookie will be stored in your browser regardless of choice to prevent you being asked this question again. You will be able to change your cookie settings at any time using the link in the footer.

DevCheck+phyphox?
#4
This is less about “recognising” a sensor than being able to reasonably support a sensor. “Unknown” or “Vendor specific” means that these are not included in vanilla Android – with more than 2.5k devices, this tends to mean undocumented: you obtain a value that you have to interpret by yourself, bad for science. In addition, many of these are so-called “virtual” sensors that are based on those that phyphox already supports.

Anyone is invited to suggest adding sensor support that opens new scientific opportunities with phyphox. The current list of feature requests is rather large, so the prospective user base –and Sebastian's time constraints– have an impact on when it would be in… Smile
Reply


Messages In This Thread
DevCheck+phyphox? - by andrea.colonna - 02-10-2022, 11:54 PM
RE: DevCheck+phyphox? - by Jens Noriʇzsɔɥ - 02-11-2022, 12:10 PM
RE: DevCheck+phyphox? - by andrea.colonna - 02-11-2022, 04:55 PM
RE: DevCheck+phyphox? - by Jens Noriʇzsɔɥ - 02-11-2022, 06:24 PM
RE: DevCheck+phyphox? - by Jens Noriʇzsɔɥ - 09-15-2022, 06:06 PM
RE: DevCheck+phyphox? - by Jens Noriʇzsɔɥ - 09-15-2022, 06:31 PM

Forum Jump: