This forum uses cookies
This forum makes use of cookies to store your login information if you are registered, and your last visit if you are not. Cookies are small text documents stored on your computer; the cookies set by this forum can only be used on this website and pose no security risk. Cookies on this forum also track the specific topics you have read and when you last read them. Please confirm whether you accept or reject these cookies being set.

A cookie will be stored in your browser regardless of choice to prevent you being asked this question again. You will be able to change your cookie settings at any time using the link in the footer.

Replace internal sensors with SensorTag
this is a bit more fundamental but would be great if possible:
I have CC1350 SensorTag to connect to iPads. Unfortunately you cannot connect to them and use the existing experiments, but use a specific Bluetooth experiment.
The basics measurements are included, but not with all displays compared to the internal sensors (probably the experiment definitions weren't updated in the same way). For the pendulum a definition is given as example, but for the roll experiment for example I copied the XML definition and modified it to use the external sensor.
My idea for a more convenient use:

Allow connecting to an external sensor and all experiments internally defined that are possible with this sensor turn blue and will use it.

I have not studied the phyphox source code, but I think the best way is to introduce an abstraction layer, that allows accessing Bluetooth sensors the same way as the internal ones rather than having to define specific stuff in the XML experiments (you would rather have device-specific XML for sensor readout definition, so yet unsupported external devices could be added like experiments).

Best regards
Hey Stefan,

thanks for your feedback! I agree that a more generic sensor input would be quite useful. I will bring this up in our meeting!

Best regards

Forum Jump: